RE: distribute-list

From: eric (namaste@pacbell.net)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 03:43:32 GMT-3

• Next message: Wojciech.Gebka@ssk.com.pl: "Re: Port #'s on DocoCD"
• Previous message: tria_ka@gmx.net: "isdn - backup - challenge - authentication ???"
• Maybe in reply to: Tom Young: "distribute-list"
• Next in thread: Jonathan V Hays: "RE: distribute-list"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Try a ? after the out and you will see the meaning. It can be your best
friend.

~e

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Tom
Young
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:15 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: distribute-list

Hi,group

  A question about distribute-list, I think if you
distribute a protocol into other one, the action should be
one-way, so, in the distribute-list command ,the in or out
parameter is meanless, I don't know why the out or in
parameter should be set like the sample following:

router ospf 1
 log-adjacency-changes
 redistribute eigrp 1 metric 20 metric-type 1 subnets
route-map filter1
 network 137.20.101.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
 distribute-list 3 out

Thanks alot

• Next message: Wojciech.Gebka@ssk.com.pl: "Re: Port #'s on DocoCD"
• Previous message: tria_ka@gmx.net: "isdn - backup - challenge - authentication ???"
• Maybe in reply to: Tom Young: "distribute-list"
• Next in thread: Jonathan V Hays: "RE: distribute-list"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:34 GMT-3