From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 18:37:40 GMT-3
Could you repost that question again?
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:49 PM
Subject: Amazing but true
> Hi everyone,
>
> Over the past few weeks, several times I've posted a question regarding
the
> two types of care-of-addresses used with Mobile IP. My question concerned
> what detemines which type of address is used and whether the type used is
> something that's configured on the router or determined by some other
means -
> perhaps the software installed on the mobile client.
>
> What surprises me though is that there hasn't been one single response! I
> don't understand how that could be. I've searched thru both the Group
Study
> archieves and Cisco's documentation and found nothing addressing this
> question. I also know that mobile IP is fair game for the lab, so I'm
amazed
> that this question continues to go unanswered.
>
> And, though I can't understand why that is I've come up with 2 theories:
>
> a) nobody knows
> b) nobody cares
>
> I can't imagine that nobody on groupstudy knows this - this is probably
the
> most knowledgable group of networking professional in the world - so let's
nix
> that idea.
>
> Could it be that nobody cares? That's also hard to imagine. Everyday,
> questions seemingly far more esoteric are posted and responded to.
Besides,
> there must be at least a few people who might need to implement Mobile IP
in
> the near future and they would certainly need to know about this. And,
even
> if nobody at the moment needed to know about this for work, most people on
> group study seemed to be very intellectually curious So, let's nix this
theory
> as well.
>
> Well, I hope this sparks some discussion, and maybe, in the process,
generates
> the answer to the original question.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:37 GMT-3