From: groupstudy@bekmezian.com
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 12:45:02 GMT-3
I would recommend priority 0. The rule of thumb is, hard code everything
whenever possible. This goes for router-ids, pvcs and anything else you
can think of.
Regards,
George Bekmezian
CCIE# 10704
"David Terry (ETL)" <David.Terry@etl.ericsson.se>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
02/26/2003 05:37 AM
Please respond to
"David Terry (ETL)" <David.Terry@etl.ericsson.se>
To
"'Tran Tien Phong'" <PhongTT2@FPT.COM.VN>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
cc
Subject
RE: Root switch
Hi Phong,
I personally would use "spanning-tree vlan 11 root primary" as long as you
"fully" meet the requirement that is the main objective. Normally the clue
is in the question.
Thanks
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Tran Tien Phong [mailto:PhongTT2@FPT.COM.VN]
Sent: 26 February 2003 11:52
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Root switch
Hi Group,
If the question asks me to configure the switch as root switch for vlan
11, which of the below commands should be used?
- spanning-tree vlan 11 priority 0
- spanning-tree vlan 11 root primary
Both of them will work well but which one do you prefer?
Thanks
Phong
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:36 GMT-3