From: Jonathan V Hays (jhays@jtan.com)
Date: Tue Feb 25 2003 - 13:12:39 GMT-3
You might try posting your configurations and a snapshot of the error
messages.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Emad
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:24 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: FW: Load balancing problem
Hey, is there anybody to help me!!
thanx
-----Original Message-----
From: Emad
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:34 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Load balancing problem
Importance: High
Because the diagram can't be shown , I want to clarify that the two ISP
are running ATM that I can't access its private IP addresses , therefore
I can't make the next-hop of the static route directly on it
Please advise
-----Original Message-----
From: Emad
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:49 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Load balancing problem
Dear all ,
I have a problem , may be simple or not , but already I have as
following:
HQ 2 ADSL routers
ATM Cloud 2 ADSL routers
remote site
192.168.0.0/24 any private Ips
any private Ips 192.168.64.0/24
10.0.0.0/30 any private
Ips
any private Ips 12.0.0.0/24
E0 = 192.168.0.1 /24
E0=192.168.64.1/24
HQ#
In e0
Ip add 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
In e1
Ip add 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
Ip route 192.168.64.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 (1st ISP ADSL router
Ethernet interface IP) Ip route 192.168.64.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.2 (
2nd ISP ADSL router interface
IP)
On this configurations I working but when the line went down from any
ISP , I can't feel and the static route will not be affected at all and
still up in spite of actually down , I need loadbalancing between these
two lines but of course reduncancy between them , of course this
configurations has to be changed but I'm waiting for recommendation
please, By the way , I can't reach the private Ips of the two ISP which
are carrying the actual link and the TWO ADSl routers are connected to
the LAN with the router in each site, Waiting for your reply
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image001.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image002.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image003.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image004.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image005.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image006.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image007.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image008.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image009.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image010.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image011.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image012.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image013.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image014.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image015.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image016.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image017.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image018.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image019.gif]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:35 GMT-3