From: Chuck Church (ccie8776@rochester.rr.com)
Date: Tue Feb 25 2003 - 13:25:24 GMT-3
Could you make the diagram a little clearer? I couldn't figure out what was
connected to what.
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Emad" <emad@zakq8.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:23 AM
Subject: FW: Load balancing problem
> Hey, is there anybody to help me!!
> thanx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emad
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:34 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Load balancing problem
> Importance: High
>
>
> Because the diagram can't be shown , I want to clarify that the two ISP
are running ATM that I can't access its private IP addresses , therefore I
can't make the next-hop of the static route directly on it
>
> Please advise
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emad
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:49 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Load balancing problem
>
> Dear all ,
> I have a problem , may be simple or not , but already I have as following:
>
>
> HQ 2 ADSL routers
> ATM Cloud 2 ADSL routers
> remote site
>
> 192.168.0.0/24 any private Ips
> any private Ips 192.168.64.0/24
>
> 10.0.0.0/30 any private Ips
> any private Ips 12.0.0.0/24
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> E0 = 192.168.0.1 /24
> E0=192.168.64.1/24
>
>
>
>
> HQ#
>
> In e0
> Ip add 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
>
> In e1
> Ip add 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
>
> Ip route 192.168.64.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 (1st ISP ADSL router
Ethernet
> interface IP)
> Ip route 192.168.64.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.2 ( 2nd ISP ADSL router
interface
> IP)
>
> On this configurations I working but when the line went down from any ISP
, I
> can't feel and the static route will not be affected at all and still up
in
> spite of actually down , I need loadbalancing between these two lines but
of
> course reduncancy between them , of course this configurations has to be
> changed but I'm waiting for recommendation please,
> By the way , I can't reach the private Ips of the two ISP which are
carrying
> the actual link and the TWO ADSl routers are connected to the LAN with the
> router in each site,
> Waiting for your reply
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image001.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image002.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image003.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image004.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image005.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image006.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image007.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image008.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image009.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image010.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image011.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image012.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image013.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image014.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image015.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image016.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image017.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image018.gif]
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image019.gif]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:35 GMT-3