RE: Does anyone know if this is possible?

From: Roberts, Larry (Larry.Roberts@expanets.com)
Date: Tue Feb 25 2003 - 00:17:36 GMT-3


A static route has an AD of 1. A directly connected interface has a AD of 0,
so the directly connected interface would always win.

I am curious as to why you would want to do this as well. I can't fathom a
reason, so I'm sure that some Sr. Exec. Has requested you do this :)

Thanks

Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: Cassidy D. Smith [mailto:csmith@plannetconsulting.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:30 PM
To: 'Jerry'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Does anyone know if this is possible?

Can you explain WHY you need to do this? There may be some tricks we can do
with host routes and policy routing. However understanding the problem may
result in a more elegant and optimal solution. Like NAT or ICMP redirects.
So if you can give us the "play by play" start with where a packet will be
sourced and where it's ultimate destination is.

Cassidy

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Jerry
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:58 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Does anyone know if this is possible?

Hello,

            I need to put a static route into an 8540, however it's next hop
ip address is in the same network
I am routing to. Example -- ip route 198.64.10.0 255.255.255.0
198.64.10.1 Does anyone know if this is possible?

Jerry



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:34 GMT-3