From: Daniel Cisco Group Study (danielcgs@imc.net.au)
Date: Thu Feb 20 2003 - 06:57:07 GMT-3
Fadil,
Here's an idea....
Set up two GRE tunnels over the 256k link, and make sure that the 2 tunnels and the 128k link all have the same OSPF cost. Run OSPF over the tunnels, but not the physical interface. This should achieve what you're after...
Of course, you'll be process switching over the tunnel, and there will be an overhead etc..... If you can live with it, then fine.
Daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: Fadil [mailto:fadiltakipte@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 19:22
To: pierreg@mail.planetkc.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Load balance-OSPF
Although they have different bandwidths , i have hardcoded equal costs on
both of the links.
(Consider it this way)
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "pierreg " <pierreg@mail.planetkc.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "Fadil" <fadiltakipte@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: Load balance-OSPF
> Fadil,
>
> OSPF does not support unequal load-balancing.
>
> Pierre-Alex
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Fadil" <fadiltakipte@hotmail.com>
> Reply-To: "Fadil" <fadiltakipte@hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 23:23:49 -0800
>
> Recently we are discussing load-balancing. I have a question about
this.
> Assume that I have two links between two sites.One of the links is 128
kbps ,
> and the other one is 256kbps.
> I want to load balance between two links. While 128 kbps link is carrying
1
> packet, 256 kbps link carries 2 packet.
> I know how to do it by using EIGRP. Can anybody teach me how i can do it
with
> OSPF ?
>
> Thanks
> Fadil
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:32 GMT-3