From: Michael Snyder (msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com)
Date: Fri Feb 21 2003 - 12:47:17 GMT-3
I don't know without testing.
Redistribution subnets and auto summarization can get real funny at
times.
On the other hand,
Why don't you make your bgp AS number and ospf process number the same?
Ospf process numbers only have local importance.
So there's no reason not to match them.
I may be mistaken, but I'll always heard you'll have big problems if you
don't match them up. I do it as a rule of thumb.
While I'm at it;
Another good rule of thumb about bullet proofing your ospf lab configs
is to ALWAYS do passive interface commands on unneighbored links.
Why send out lsa's that won't heard?
Any know what the other reason is that you should never send out
unneighbored lsa's in the lab?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Emad
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:52 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF and bgp redistribution
Hi,
Do u know if there is any difference between :
Router ospf 100
Redistribute bgp 200 subnets
Router bgp 200
(with the default auto summarization)
and
router ospf 100
redistribute bgp 200
router bgp 200
no auto-summary
do both configurations give the same result?
regards
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:32 GMT-3