From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Feb 21 2003 - 16:42:20 GMT-3
I think that's a typo.The de-group number should map to the de-list number.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fwan
_c/wcffrely.htm#1002874
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tasuka Amano Hsu" <tasuka@mac.com>
To: "ccielab Groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:52 PM
Subject: frame de bits and ip precedence bits
> Hi,
> I read the IP QoS Book and found the example at page 199
> to map the IP precedence bits to frame relay de bit
>
> !
> frame-relay de-list 1 protocol ip list 101
> !
> interface serial 1/0/0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> !
> interface serial1/0/0.1 point-to-point
> frame-relay interface-dlci 18 broadcast
> frame-relay de-group 101 18
> !
> access-list 101 permit ip any any precedence routing
> !
>
> does the command frame-relay de-group map to frame-relay de-list
> is 101 or 1 ?
>
> Best Regards
> tasuka
> .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:28 GMT-3