RE: BGP neighbor

From: Mohammed Al-zubi (mohammed@sulafsolutions.com)
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 05:38:20 GMT-3

The first rule in accepting BGP routes, the next-hop-address, in this care
the loopback of the advertising router, has to be in the routing table,
whether its a host static, subnet static, learned by an IMP, it has to be
there, a default route will not do the job

Mohammed

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Mohammed Al-Zubi
VP Professional Services
24 Werner Ave. #21
Daly City, CA 94014
Tel: (650) 438-6384
Fax: (720) 293-4897
Email: mohammed@sulafsolutions.com
Web: www.sulafsolutions.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Janto Cin
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:05 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: BGP neighbor

Dear All,

Please help on my problem below:

(lo0)R1(s0)-------------(s0)R2(lo0)

R1(lo0): 10.33.1.1/24
R1(s0): 173.168.40.1/24
R2(s0): 173.168.40.2/24
R2(lo0): 44.1.1.1/24

R1 

----
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 173.168.40.2

router bgp 1
neighbor 44.1.1.1 remote 1
neighbor 44.1.1.1 update lo0

R2
----
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 173.168.40.1

router bgp 1
neighbor 10.33.1.1 remote 1
neighbor 10.33.1.1 update lo0

I can ping R1 lo0 from R2 and vice-versa, but why the bgp connection still
not
established?
I turn on debug ip bgp on both routers and get this:
on R1
--------
01:45:46: BGP: 44.1.1.1 multihop open delayed 17789ms (no route)

on R2
--------
01:35:20: BGP: 10.33.1.1 multihop open delayed 11888ms (no route)

TIA,
Janto

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:26 GMT-3