From: Mohammed Al-zubi (mohammed@sulafsolutions.com)
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 05:39:46 GMT-3
Aaron,
I've seen similar configurations, specially at banks (ATMs running FR/OSPF).
to be honest, if there are no networks behind the spoke routers (I think
there are none because you were going to configure them as Totally stubby) I
would just implement static routes, you would just have to put a default at
the remote sites, and 400 statics at the hub, its MUCH less work and
headache, and this way when you roll it out you have less configuration to
deal with. If you still need these routes to appear in the OSPF domain
beyond the hub, then redistribute it back to OSPF at the hub with a summary
address, so 400 networks would show up in your site routing table as one
route, and you just simplified the configuration of 400 sites.
Thanks,
Mohammed
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Mohammed Al-Zubi
VP Professional Services
24 Werner Ave. #21
Daly City, CA 94014
Tel: (650) 438-6384
Fax: (720) 293-4897
Email: mohammed@sulafsolutions.com
Web: www.sulafsolutions.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Aaron Woody
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:21 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF for 400+ Locations
I have experience with OSPF but I am looking for suggestions on how to
implement OSPF in a Frame-Relay Hub/Spoke topology for 400+ locations. Each
location only needs to know about the host through a default. My first idea
is to have a separate area for each location and make it a totally stubby
area. Is there a better way. My concern is that there will be 400+ areas in
the OSPF Database at the host. The host will be a Cisco 3745. The remotes
will all be Cisco 1751.
Thanks!
Aaron
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had
a name of winmail.dat]
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:26 GMT-3