From: Jerry (phase90@comcast.net)
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 21:32:44 GMT-3
This is not surprising to me. I don't know how many of you have ever worked
on an 8510 or 8440
as I don't believe they were popular boxes but I once had occasion to do
policy routing on the 8510.
The image, which was past 12.x(X0 something takes the route map but when
attempting to apply to
the interface I got the dreaded unrecognized command.
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: Kip Palmer <kip.palmer@verizon.net>
To: 'Kip Palmer' <kip.palmer@verizon.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: 3550 no NAT?
> Yeah, I hear you.
>
> I can also do a >sh ip nat [keyword] ...successfullyy
>
> But,... go to global and try to key anything relative to the service.
>
> No worky!...............????
>
>
>
> Maybe a diff keyword? (global)
>
> Kip Palmer
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Kip Palmer
> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 10:22 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: 3550 no NAT?
>
>
> -Back me up on this; The 3550 EMI does NOT do NAT.
>
> ==That's a question==
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Kip Palmer
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:25 GMT-3