DLSW redundacy methode-need confirmation

From: Ali Fahmi (afahmi@plasa.com)
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 08:07:51 GMT-3


Hi All,
I have topology like this,

                                                 R2----|
(VlanA)-R1 -------- F/R claud ------| |(VLanB)
                                                 R3 ---|

Configure dlsw on R1, R2 and R3, VLAN A can comunicate to
VLAN B,
R1 should prefer R2, dont use cost or backup peer,

Does dlsw redundancy is a best mothode to achieve this
requirement ?

Is config below right ?

R1
  
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.1
dlsw bridge-group 1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.2
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.3

bridge 1 protocol ieee

interface E0
   bridge-group 1

R2
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.2 prom

interface E0
  dlsw transparent redundancy-enable 9999.9999.9999
master-priority 10

R3
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.3 prom

interface E0
  dlsw transparent redundancy-enable 9999.9999.9999

thanks

===========================================================================================
Meriahkan Hari Kasih Sayang dengan mengirimkan Kartu Elektronik PlasaCom kepada kerabat dan teman yang Anda kasihi !
Pilih kartu favorit Anda di Polling Lomba Desain Kartu Tema Valentine
di http://kartu.plasa.com/lomba/
===========================================================================================



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:25 GMT-3