RE: BGP neighbor

From: David Terry (ETL) (David.Terry@etl.ericsson.se)
Date: Fri Feb 14 2003 - 10:11:27 GMT-3

• Next message: Chad A Simmons: "Re: CPU utilization"
• Previous message: Dang Quang Minh: "RE: Binding Frame-Relay T1's"
• Maybe in reply to: Janto Cin: "BGP neighbor"
• Next in thread: David Terry (ETL): "RE: BGP neighbor"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Janto,

Can you do 2 extended pings each sourcing from the loopback address or R1 and R2 to the other loopback address ?

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Janto Cin [mailto:jantocin@datacomm.co.id]
Sent: 14 February 2003 12:05
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: BGP neighbor

Dear All,

Please help on my problem below:

(lo0)R1(s0)-------------(s0)R2(lo0)

R1(lo0): 10.33.1.1/24
R1(s0): 173.168.40.1/24
R2(s0): 173.168.40.2/24
R2(lo0): 44.1.1.1/24

R1

----
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 173.168.40.2
router bgp 1
neighbor 44.1.1.1 remote 1
neighbor 44.1.1.1 update lo0
R2
----
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 173.168.40.1
router bgp 1
neighbor 10.33.1.1 remote 1
neighbor 10.33.1.1 update lo0
I can ping R1 lo0 from R2 and vice-versa, but why the bgp connection still not
established?
I turn on debug ip bgp on both routers and get this:
on R1
--------
01:45:46: BGP: 44.1.1.1 multihop open delayed 17789ms (no route)
on R2
--------
01:35:20: BGP: 10.33.1.1 multihop open delayed 11888ms (no route)
TIA,
Janto

• Next message: Chad A Simmons: "Re: CPU utilization"
• Previous message: Dang Quang Minh: "RE: Binding Frame-Relay T1's"
• Maybe in reply to: Janto Cin: "BGP neighbor"
• Next in thread: David Terry (ETL): "RE: BGP neighbor"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:22 GMT-3