From: Jonathan Charles (jrcdehc@ameritech.net)
Date: Sat Feb 08 2003 - 03:04:56 GMT-3
Put an Ip router isis under the e1/1 interface on R1...
And if you are worried about accidentally forming an adjacency off of
that int, then forgo the above and redistribute connected...
J
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tony Kwok
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 21:13
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: About the ISIS routing question.
Hi,
I have found one very interesting thing on isis. Does
anyone can explain. The following is my netwrok
topology. The R1 has two ethernet interface. One is
connecting to R2.
R1------------R2
R1 configuration.
================
interface Ethernet1/0
ip address 150.50.17.1 255.255.255.0
Description connecting to R2
ip router isis
!
interface Ethernet1/1
ip address 150.50.200.1 255.255.255.0
half-duplex
router isis
passive-interface Ethernet1/1
net 11.1111.1111.1111.1111.00
is-type level-1
R2 Configuration
===============
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 150.50.17.2 255.255.255.0
ip router isis
duplex auto
speed auto
router isis
net 11.1111.1111.1111.1112.00
is-type level-1
***************************************
From this configuration, I suppose that I cannot
receive the route 150.50.200.0/24 on R2 through the
isis because the interface has not join the isis and
also it has not redistribute out by the redistribute
command. However, I found that I am wrong. Does
someone can explain why? I have tested that the route
will be disappeared once I delete the passive
interface command on the router configuration. Thx.
R2#sh ip route isis
i L1 150.50.200.0/24 [115/10] via 150.50.17.1,
FastEthernet0/0
Regards,
Tony
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:16 GMT-3