From: kym blair (kymblair@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Feb 07 2003 - 21:39:42 GMT-3
Yes, your answer is the most effecient one-rule filter those four routes.
A few more will slip thru too (12 extra first-octet addresses, 4 extra
second-octet addresses, and 28 extra third-octet addresses). Is that
acceptable in your scenario?
Kym
>From: "pita40" <pita40@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "pita40" <pita40@hotmail.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Filtering
>Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:48:21 -0500
>
>I want to filter the following routes using one access-list.
>
>157.173.52.0
>144.160.58.0
>151.168.122.0
>154.164.106.0
>
>I got 144.160.32.0 15.13.94.255
>
>Is this answer correct?
>
>Please help.
>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:16 GMT-3