From: Richard Davidson (rich@myhomemail.net)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 19:11:13 GMT-3
im looking into this for my self right now. I good
link i found was:
Rich
--- cannonr <cannonr@attbi.com> wrote:
> Dialer Watch is the best method in my opinion. It
> is routing protocol
> independant because it watches the actual routing
> table. There is much less
> admin work than DDR. It is also faster than DDR
> because with DDR, you may
> be waiting for an INARP entry to dissapear if a
> subinterface dies.
>
> Royce
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "sam" <sam@avtechusa.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 1:02 PM
> Subject: ISDN: Back up interface - Which do you
> prefer?
>
>
> > Hey all, I appreciate your time taken to read
> this.
> >
> > It is my understanding that there are several
> methods that can be used
> > to configure an On-Demand ISDN line as a backup.
> > In particular,
> >
> >
> > - OSPF demand-circuit to suppress OSPF
> hello-packets
> > - EIGRP on-demand-routing (ODR) using CDP
> to halt EIGRP routing
> > updates keeping link alive
> > - Dialer Watch Group used to monitor
> specific routes instead of
> > an interface
> >
> > I can understand different methods deployed if you
> use different routing
> > protocols, but are there any advantages to any
> method, or a preferred
> > style that you might use? Any other methods you
> find desirable?
> >
> > TIA!
> >
> > Sam Sena
> > Avtech Technologies
> > 4500 New Brunswick Ave
> > Piscataway NJ
> > (732) 424-8008 (o)
> > (732) 424-7388 (f)
> > .
> .
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:13 GMT-3