From: Thomas Stuart (tastuart@comcast.net)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 23:02:01 GMT-3
young,
thanks for your input. i am familiar with all other dlsw required commands.
it's just that i came across an example, that used the ip's on the e0/0's
and i know you can use either loops or e0/0's, but wasn't sure of the
approach for ccie lab.
i guess that if it is NOT specified to use loops, i could really use any ip
add. on the routers, EVEN if dlsw connectivity is required between certain
interfaces, as long as i provide the necessary bridge commands.
this issue is really more "semantics"
tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Young K. Bae" <ybae@cisco.com>
To: "'Thomas Stuart'" <tastuart@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:24 PM
Subject: RE: dlsw
> It simply means that e0/0 interfaces on both r1 and r2 needs to be
connected
> to the dlsw processes of each router. You can do this by enter "dlsw
> bridge-group" command. As far as the IP connectivity goes, you can use
the
> loopback addresses. Remember, the "bridge-group" command alone under the
> interface does not connect the interface with the dlsw process on the
> router.
>
> HTH
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Thomas Stuart
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:22 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: dlsw
> >
> >
> > when configuring dlsw, and i am asked to "configure dlsw
> > between router 1's ethernet 0/0, and router 2's ethernet 0/0",
> >
> > do i need to use the ip addresses for those particular
> > interfaces ( e0/0 on r1 and e0/0 on r2 ) for dlsw local-peers
> > and remote-peers???
> >
> > i thought that i could just use configured loops on each of
> > the routers, and let "bridge-group 1" on the interfaces takes
> > care of the rest, and still accomplish dlsw connectivity.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > tom
> > .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:09 GMT-3