Re: ISDN link is not any routing protocols

From: Aamer Kaleem (kaleemaamer@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 22:03:20 GMT-3


If no routing protocol can run on ISDN link, then you
can run a tunnel that in event of main link failure
would route over ISDN link and required routing
protocol can run on the tunnel.

Thank you,

Aamer

--- Tony Schaffran <tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com>
wrote:
> Joe,
>
> Then, how would your ISDN ever come down?
>
>
>
> Tony Schaffran
> Network Analyst
> CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE
>
> www.cconlinelabs.com
> "Your #1 choice for Cisco rack rentals."
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>
> To: <Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:50 PM
> Subject: Re: ISDN link is not any routing protocols
>
>
> > Set dialer idle-timeout to 0 on both ends.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:10 PM
> > Subject: ISDN link is not any routing protocols
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a scenario that states the following:
> > > 1- ISDN link does not belong to any routing
> protocols.
> > > 2- You are allowed one default route in one side
> and a static route in
> the
> > > other side.
> > > 3- The side that has a default route should able
> to initiate an isdn
> call
> > if
> > > it loses its connectivity to the network.
> > > 4- Only the side that has the default route
> should be able to initiate
> an
> > > isdn call.
> > >
> > > To meet these requirement I configure a default
> route pointing to next
> hop
> > > address (address in the dialer map statement)
> and then I redistribute
> > static
> > > into the IGP. This works fine. If I shut down
> the serial interface, the
> ip
> > > traffic initiate the isdn link and I can reach
> every part of the
> network.
> > > However, after the idle time out, I can not
> reach the ip address of the
> > isdn
> > > link from various parts of the network (because
> it is down) Is any
> > > workaround for this. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Sam
> > > .
> > .
> .
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:09 GMT-3