From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 16:18:09 GMT-3
At 01:56 PM 2/4/2003 -0500, OhioHondo wrote:
>I've always wondered if the default route automatically generated by a stub
>area is permitted. Might as well ask the proctor.
I still am not sure what the fuss it over proper networking activities.
Particularly default routes and null0 routes for aggregates. These are
necessary elements in most networks, and certainly considered best practise
networking concepts in many situations. Deliberately disabling seems odd
to me :-)
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Peter van Oene
>Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:24 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: OSPF stub areas
>
>
>At 02:27 PM 2/4/2003 +0000, Matthew Poole wrote:
> >More assumptions!
> >
> >Should I assume that OSPF areas should be configured as stubs if eligible
>to
> >be so, although the lab doesn't specifically request it?
> >
> >I've just completed a lab and in the solution they did this - why not take
>it
> >one step further and make it totally stubby?
>
>Why would you do this? LSA's are a good thing in many networks.
>
>
>
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Mat.
> >.
>.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:07 GMT-3