Re: OSPF stub areas

From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 15:23:43 GMT-3


At 02:27 PM 2/4/2003 +0000, Matthew Poole wrote:
>More assumptions!
>
>Should I assume that OSPF areas should be configured as stubs if eligible to
>be so, although the lab doesn't specifically request it?
>
>I've just completed a lab and in the solution they did this - why not take it
>one step further and make it totally stubby?

Why would you do this? LSA's are a good thing in many networks.

>Thanks,
>
>Mat.
>.
.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:07 GMT-3