From: Ed Hilquist (ed@hilquist.net)
Date: Mon Feb 03 2003 - 19:28:17 GMT-3
DRP Server Agent
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_conf
iguration_guide_chapter09186a00800b3e13.html#1001085
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
steve r
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:05 PM
To: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de; tim@fletchmail.net;
Jim.Brown@caselogic.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: distributed dirrector?
Any one know what distributer dirrector is used for and how to configure
it....
----- Original Message -----
From: <Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de>
To: <tim@fletchmail.net>; <Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de>;
<Jim.Brown@caselogic.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:18 AM
Subject: RE: 3350
> Tim
>
> That's exactly what I mean.
>
> Sam
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Fletcher [mailto:tim@fletchmail.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:44 PM
> To: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de; Jim.Brown@caselogic.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: 3350
>
>
> interface Vlan0
> no ip address
> !
> interface Vlan1
> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Vlan2
> ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Vlan10
> ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
>
> OK, which vlan is the management vlan?
>
> -Tim Fletcher
>
> At 04:52 PM 1/30/2003 -0500, Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de wrote:
> >OK this my last email in this.
> >Can you call a VLAN a STP VLAN? of course not. All VLANs are running
> >STP. This is not a characteristic of any one VLAN. The same thing with
> >the management vlan. You can manage from all VLANs. in the cat 5500 OS,
> >we use to call it the management vlan because you can add the sc0
> >interface to only one vlan and manage the switch from this vlan. But
> >this is not true with the catalyst 3550.
> >
> >Cheers.
> >
> >Sam
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jim Brown [mailto:Jim.Brown@caselogic.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:21 PM
> >To: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de
> >Subject: RE: 3350
> >
> >
> >
> >This is the quote from the documentation. The 2950 and the 3550 have
> >the same layer 2 and layer 3 functionality. The Cisco document is
> >referring to a MANAGEMENT VLAN on the 2950.
> >
> >"The Catalyst 2950 command switch (running Release 12.1(9)EA1 or later)
> >in Figure 6-5 and the Catalyst 3550 command switch in Figure 6-6 have
> >ports assigned to VLANs 9, 16, and 62. The management VLAN on the
> >Catalyst 2950 command switch is VLAN 9. Each command switch discovers
> >the switches in the different management VLANs except these:"
> >
> >What would you call the VLAN running between two 3550 out of the box
> >with the default configurations? The management VLAN.
>
> The default vlan.
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de [
> ><mailto:Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de>
> >mailto:Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:10 PM
> >To: Jim Brown; Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de; MkMiara@netscape.net;
> >ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: 3350
> >
> >
> >No, there is a management VLAN in the Catalyst 3550. The switch can be
> >managed by telneting to any SVI or routed interface assuming that
> >routing is
> >
> >intact. What mentioned in the documentation is about the management
> >VLAN in other switches such as 2900. If I am wrong, please guide me to
> >the exact link. Please refer to the link below.
> >
> >
> ><http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1218ea1/3550
> >scg/s
> >w>
> >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1218ea1/3550s
> >cg/sw
> >
> >clus.htm#1058089
> >
> >
> >Sam
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jim Brown [ <mailto:Jim.Brown@caselogic.com>
> >mailto:Jim.Brown@caselogic.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:34 PM
> >To: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de; MkMiara@netscape.net;
> >ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: 3350
> >
> >
> >Yes there is a management VLAN on the 3550. Check out the docs and look
> >in the index under Management VLAN. It may not be what is considered
> >the traditional management VLAN but the docs refer to one on the 3550.
> >
> >I think the point of the question is to make the switch accessible via
> >IP using VLAN 12. To meet the requirements I would assign an IP address
> >to interface VLAN 12 on the switch with a valid address for the network
> >designated for VLAN 12.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de [
> ><mailto:Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de>
> >mailto:Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de]
> >
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:28 PM
> >To: Jim Brown; MkMiara@netscape.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: 3350
> >
> >
> >I do not think that the cat 3550 has something called the management
> >VLAN. The switch can be managed by any VLAN or routed interface
> >(assuming the interior routing is working) I think that the question
> >below is worded very poorly.
> >
> >Sam
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jim Brown [ <mailto:Jim.Brown@caselogic.com>
> >mailto:Jim.Brown@caselogic.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:12 PM
> >To: MkMiara@netscape.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: 3350
> >
> >
> >Assign the management VLAN and ip address in the range of the other
> >devices on VLAN 12.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: MkMiara@netscape.net [ <mailto:MkMiara@netscape.net>
> >mailto:MkMiara@netscape.net]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:56 AM
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: 3350
> >
> >
> >What is meant when a lab asks: Insert the 3550 into VLAN 12 Scenario
> >would have 4 VLAN's total. Would it be assigning a Loopback IP in the
> >subnet of VLAN-12?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >__________________________________________________________________
> >The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now!
> > <http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp>
> >http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp
> >
> >Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
> > <http://webmail.netscape.com/> http://webmail.netscape.com/ . . . .
> .
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:04 GMT-3