From: Jay Greenberg (groupstudylist@execulink.com)
Date: Mon Feb 03 2003 - 14:19:48 GMT-3
Agreed, this is a question from one of the Solie labs.
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 13:08, Balaji Siva wrote:
> I think, the question was taken from the old cat5k world and old lab
> questions. You can't do that in cat3550 AFAIK.
>
> setting port cos would not gaurantee that port would be able to send
> data through the backplane earlier than some other port with lower cos
> or no cos. Advantage is that the packet is preferentially treated in the
> egress scheduling
>
>
>
> Balaji
>
>
>
> Ali Fahmi wrote:
>
> > I'm not really sure my answer correct or not since there is no docs
> > about this ,
> > change default CoS for all incoming packets from 0 (default value) to
> > higher value, example:
> > mls qos cos 5
> >
> > any comments?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:37:25 +1100 (EST)
> > Hunt Lee <ciscoforme3@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Group,
> >>
> >> I have a lab requirement which says:-
> >>
> >> Configure the 3550 so that if the backplane of the switch gets
> >> overloaded, the ports
> >> in VLAN 3 get serviced before the ports in VLAN 5.
> >>
> >> Anyone knows how to achieve this?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> H.
> >>
> >> http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
> >> - What's on at your local cinema?
> >> .
> >
> > ===========================================================================================
> >
> > Meriahkan Tahun Baru Imlek dengan mengirimkan Kartu Elektronik
> > PlasaCom kepada kerabat dan teman Anda
> > Kepada para pengguna TELKOMSave, lakukan pergantian kartu lama Anda
> > segera ! http://www.telkomsave.com
> > ===========================================================================================
> >
> > .
> --
> ***************************************
> Balaji Sivasubramanian
> TAC LAN Techlogies WW SME
> Cisco Systems
> RTP, NC, 27709
> Ph: 919 392 7596
> E-mail: bsivasub@cisco.com
> URL: http://www-tac.cisco.com/~bsivasub
> ****************************************
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:01 GMT-3