From: Stuart Juggins (sjuggins@cisco.com)
Date: Mon Feb 03 2003 - 12:08:37 GMT-3
Hi Luis,
Have a look at this link, it explains it pretty well, option 4 is what you
want to pay close attention to :-
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/dcprob.html
Hope it helps,
Stuart.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Luis Miguel Gil
Sent: 03 February 2003 12:48
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: peer neighbor route
Hi, future ccies,
I don't really understand the effect of the command "(no) peer neighbor
route" when establishing a dialup connection between two routers. With the
"no..." the routing does not install a connected route (/32) to the
neighbor, but it install a proper route (i.e. a /24) to the same network.
Without, wich is the default option, both (/32 and /24) appear in the
routing table. So what ? I mean, what is the impact of having this route
(/32) ? Everything works in the same way, I think...
Thanks in advance,
Luis Miguel.
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:01 GMT-3