From: OhioHondo (ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com)
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 23:56:27 GMT-3
What if you defined a more specific address in the 151.100.0.0/16 address
space to a loopback interface, defined to OSPF, on R4. Would this route then
be propagated to the other OSPF routers and redistributed into RIP as
151.100.0.0/16?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Hunt Lee
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:17 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Please help!!! EIGRP to OSPF to RIP
Hi guys,
I thought this is easy, but I have spent hours on it & still couldn't solve
it.
151.100.0.0/15 ---- R1 ----- R2 ------- R3 --------- R4 --------- R5
(EIGRP)
R1 - using EIGRP
R2 - using both EIGRP & OSPF (mutual redistributeion)
R3 - using OSPF
R4 - using OSPF & RIPv1 (mutual redistribution)
R5 - using RIPv1
The network 151.100.0.0/15 is generated by EIGRP summary-address command in
R1 (not allowed to change).
The IPs for the transfer network is as follows:-
R1 to R2 :- 140.100.3.1 /30 & 140.100.3.2 /30
R2, R3 & R4 (Hub & Spoke topology, where R3 is the hub, while R2 & R4 are
spokes - 140.100.1.1 /24, 140.100.1.2/24 & 140.100.1.3/24
R4 to R5:- can be set to any IPs here... currently I'm using 140.100.5.1/24
& 140.100.5.2/24
I couldn't get R5 to see 151.100.0.0/15 or 151.100.0.0/16 at all. Assume
that I'm not allowed to use any "summary-address" or aggregate commands from
any routing protocols, is there any other way I could get R5 to see this
route?
Lee
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:50 GMT-3