From: Brian McGahan (brian@cyscoexpert.com)
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 01:09:36 GMT-3
Kelly,
Is maximum-paths set to an integer greater than 1? Here's a doc
on load balancing troubleshooting:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/loadbal_cef.html
HTH
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
Director of Design and Implementation
brian@cyscoexpert.com
CyscoExpert Corporation
Internetwork Consulting & Training
Voice: 847.674.3392
Fax: 847.674.2625
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Kelly Cobean
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:29 PM
> To: ccielab
> Subject: OSPF, Default Routes, and maybe a little tagging.
>
> Hey all, I'm wondering about some behavior that I'm seeing on my
routers
> that I don't understand. I have two routers on different networks
> originating default-information into my OSPF domain. Further down in
my
> network, but equal distance (cost) from both of these originating
routers,
> I
> have a router that shows only a single path in the routing table to
the
> default route. The metric-type is E2, and advertisements of 0.0.0.0
from
> both routers are in the downstream routers OSPF database, but only one
is
> making it in to the routing table. The downstream router is in a
> different
> area (Area 1) from routers injecting the default (Area0). Any ideas
as to
> why only one of the default routes is making it into the routing
table?
> Below is some simple ASCII to show the setup.
>
>
> BGP
> -------R1 --F/R PTP Link-- R2 R1/R2 are ASBR's sending 0.0.0.0
into
> Area0
> OSPF | | Links from R1->Rx and R2->Ry are
Fast
> ether.
> | |
> Rx Ry Rx/Ry are ABR's connecting Area 0 to
> Area
> 1
> \ /
> \ /
> \ /
> \ /
> \ /
> \ /
> s0.100 | | s0.200 Rg has PVC to Rx, PVC to Ry, both
in
> Area
> 1
> - Rg - both are 256K.
>
>
>
>
> Any input appreciated. Thanks.
> Kelly Cobean
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:49 GMT-3