From: Vijay S Jayaraman (vjayaram@in.ibm.com)
Date: Tue Jan 14 2003 - 10:02:34 GMT-3
IPX is alright too...........
Regards,
Vijay.
"kym blair"
<kymblair@hotmail To: phase90@comcast.net, tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: SAP ACL's
nobody@groupstudy
.com
01/14/2003 06:01
PM
Please respond to
"kym blair"
SNA and NETBIOS are correct. I don't know about IPX.
Kym
>From: Jerry <phase90@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: Jerry <phase90@comcast.net>
>To: Tony Schaffran <tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: SAP ACL's
>Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:21:52 -0500
>
>I agree with this Tony - I've seen these same ones over the past several
>years studying for the written
>
>on CCO.
>
>
>Jerry
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Tony Schaffran <tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:15 PM
>Subject: SAP ACL's
>
>
> > To allow SNA only:
> >
> > access-list 200 permit 0x0000 0x0D0D
> >
> > To filter NetBIOS:
> >
> > access-list 200 deny 0xF0F0 0x0101
> > access-list 200 permit 0x0000 0xFFFF
> >
> > To filter IPX:
> >
> > access-list 200 deny 0xE0E0 0x0101
> > access-list 200 permit 0x0000 0xFFFF
> >
> > Does anybody disagree? I have seen many documents contradict each
>other.
> > This is what I have found.
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/698/acl200.html
> >
> >
> > Tony Schaffran
> > Network Analyst
> > CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> > NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE
> >
> > www.cconlinelabs.com
> > "Your #1 choice for Cisco rack rentals."
> > .
>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:49 GMT-3