From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 10:58:31 GMT-3
Sage, the line:
dialer map ip 155.100.5.0 name R1 broadcast 99065143
is a standard part of the dialer watch implementation.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri-backup-map-watch.html#conf
In the texts this detail is usually not explicitly pointed out, so it took
me a while to catch it too.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sage Vadi" <sagevadi@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 3:29 AM
Subject: ISDN: dialer-watch
> Hi all,
>
> interface BRI0
> ~cut~
> dialer map ip 155.100.2.1 name R1 broadcast 99065143
> dialer map ip 155.100.5.0 name R1 broadcast 99065143*
> dialer watch-group 243
>
> ~more~
> dialer watch-list 243 ip 155.100.5.0 255.255.255.0
>
> Q) When the 155.100.5.0 route gets taken away from the
> route-table the dialer-watch fails to get activated.
>
> Debugs -
>
> DDR: Dialer Watch: watch-group = 243
> DDR: network 155.100.5.0/255.255.255.0 DOWN,
> DDR: primary DOWN
> DDR: Dialer Watch: Dial Reason: Primary of group 243
> DOWN
> DDR: Dialer Watch: watch-group = 243,
>
> The only reason why I put the config line marked * was
> because without that line the dialer-watch fails to
> activate.
>
> The ISDN line is fine, I can get this line. It is not
> a ISDN issue. It is something wrong with dialer-watch,
> either config or a bug.
>
> Q) Does everyone agree that we shouldn't need to put a
> dialer map statement for the failed network in the
> bri0 interface? I would not normally put it there, but
> debugs indicated I had to.
>
> Thoughts appreciated.
> Cheers,
> Sage
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:47 GMT-3