From: love cisco (love_cisco@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 09 2003 - 19:12:43 GMT-3
Thanks, Scott.
How about a range of MAC address. Do I have to do the bit swap on MAC
address MASK?
For example,
One Ethernet canonical MAC address range is from ab12.cd34.ef56 to
ab12.cd34.f082. This MAC address range has 300 MAC addresses.
So what is this DLSW filtering could be?
dlsw icanreach mac-address 5d84.3bc2.7fa6 mask ffff.ffff.f12c
or MAC access-list
access-list 700 permit 5d84.3bc2.7fa6 0000.0000.012c
Am I right?
Thanks
>From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
>Reply-To: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
>To: "'love cisco'" <love_cisco@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: Dlsw+ access-list filter for MAC address
>Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 06:57:23 -0500
>
>This has been answered a lot in the past few weeks! :)
>
>YES, you still have to worry about it! Even though both of your
>ethernet's don't care, DLSW as a technology talks about things just like
>Token Ring does natively. So everything will get bit-swapped twice from
>ethernet into DLSW and then back out again. All filtering needs to be
>done in a bit-swapped manner.
>
>Scott
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>love cisco
>Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:22 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Dlsw+ access-list filter for MAC address
>
>
>Hi, friends
>
>Just want to confirm that since Token Ring is gone in the new lab. So we
>
>don't have to worry about convert canonical to no nocanonical for MAC
>access-list. Is that right?
>
>thanks!
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>SkA*;z5DEsSQ=xPP=;Aw#,GkJ9SC MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/cn
>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:46 GMT-3