From: William Li (weilica@sympatico.ca)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 02:16:24 GMT-3
Thanks guys;
I got your point. The option advertise doesn't have any functional
difference between the default action.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Emre
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:58 PM
To: William Li; nobody@groupstudy.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OSPF area command with advertise option
Hi William ,
You are definitely right.
Possibly you know but the not-advertise option of that command is
especially
useful when you don't want to advertise a route to area 0.
Regards
Emre
CCIE #10916
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Li" <weilica@sympatico.ca>
To: <nobody@groupstudy.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: OSPF area command with advertise option
> Hi group
>
>
>
> I just happened to find there is an advertise option could be added
> in "area area-id range ip-address mask" command. The command could be
> like this "area area-id range ip-address mask advertise". My question
> is, will there be any functional difference between with and without
> this option. As per DOC CD, option "advertise" means: Sets the address
> range status to advertise and generates a Type 3 summary link-state
> advertisement (LSA). But by default, when we generate a summary
address
> in ABR without any options, the summary address will be advertised
> automatically, am I right?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> William
> .
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:45 GMT-3