Re: EIGRP Summary-address behavior

From: Sage Vadi (sagevadi@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 05:30:13 GMT-3


As Tim indicated,

R7#sh ip route 192.168.0.0
~cut~
* directly connected, via Null0 <--
~cut~

Q) Why should it show admin distance locally, when it
has a directly connected Null0? Have you got this in
your lab? Please paste your output and show commands
if you do.

 --- Aidan Marks <amarks@cisco.com> wrote: > sh ip
route 192.168.0.0 and it will show the
> distance in the verbose view.
>
> At 05:55 PM 7/01/2003, Sage Vadi wrote:
>
> >Aidan,
> >
> >Locally on the ABR this is what it gets -
> >
> >D 192.168.0.0/22 is a summary, 00:52:38, Null0
> >
> >There is no indication of AD.
> >
> >I'm going to test with another IOS.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Sage
> >
> >
> > --- Aidan Marks <amarks@cisco.com> wrote: > At
> 05:11
> >PM 7/01/2003, Sage Vadi wrote:
> > >
> > > >Elmer/Cebuano,
> > > >
> > > >On my core router:
> > > >D 192.168.0.0/22 [90/2169856] via 116.16.37.2
> > > >
> > > >On my ABR I have configured:
> > > >ip summary-add eigrp 100 192.168.0.0
> 255.255.252.0
> > > 5
> > > >
> > > >A# To me it DOES seems that the core router
> learns
> > > the
> > > >summarization as a InternalEIGRP route with AD
> of
> > > 90.
> > > >
> > > >This is testing with 12.2(12.5)T, I can also
> test
> > > with
> > > >12.2(10b) if you like.
> > > >
> > > >Q) Anybody else know why? According to AD
> charts
> > > >summarized EIGRP routes = 5
> > >
> > > AD is local. If you look at the AD of the
> summary
> > > to null0 via show ip
> > > route it should be 5 i.e. "distance 5". The
> other
> > > router picks it up as
> > > just another EIGRP route (internal) and
> therefore
> > > gets AD 90 on the other
> > > router.
> > >
> > > Yes?
> > >
> > > Aidan
> > >
> > >
> > > >Cheers,
> > > >Sage
> > > >
> > > > --- cebuano <cebu2ccie@cox.net> wrote: >
> Hello.
> > > > > I'd like to know if the command "ip
> > > summary-address
> > > > > eigrp" as documented
> > > > > on CCO has changed. It is described under
> the
> > > > > command reference as
> > > > > follows.
> > > > >
> > > > > EIGRP summary routes are given an
> administrative
> > > > > distance value of 5.
> > > > > The administrative distance metric is used
> to
> > > > > advertise a summary
> > > > > without installing it in the routing table.
> > > > > But I'm getting two conflicting results.
> > > > > 1. I don't see the admin distance of 5.
> > > > > 2. I see the summary installed in the
> routing
> > > table.
> > > > >
> > > > > MC3810a(config-if)#ip summary-address eigrp
> 2001
> > > > > 150.100.200.0
> > > > > 255.255.255.0
> > > > >
> > > > > MC3810a#ir
> > > > >
> > > > > 150.100.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 7
> > > > > subnets, 2 masks
> > > > > D 150.100.200.0/24 is a summary,
> 00:02:41,
> > > > > Null0
> > > > > C 150.100.200.0/30 is directly
> connected,
> > > > > Serial0
> > > > > D 150.100.100.0/24 [90/2681856] via
> > > > > 150.100.200.1, 00:02:07,
> > > > > Serial0
> > > > > D EX 150.100.2.0/24 [170/2195456] via
> > > > > 150.100.200.1, 00:02:07,
> > > > > Serial0
> > > > > C 150.100.3.0/24 is directly
> connected,
> > > > > Ethernet0
> > > > > D EX 150.100.1.0/24 [170/2195456] via
> > > > > 150.100.200.1, 00:02:07,
> > > > > Serial0
> > > > > D 150.100.10.0/24 [90/2185984] via
> > > > > 150.100.200.1, 00:02:09,
> > > > > Serial0
> > > > >
> > > > > MC3810a#sh ip eigrp topo
> > > > > IP-EIGRP Topology Table for
> > > > > AS(2001)/ID(192.168.254.1)
> > > > >
> > > > > P 150.100.200.0/24, 1 successors, FD is
> 2169856
> > > > > via Summary (2169856/0), Null0
> > > > > P 150.100.200.0/30, 1 successors, FD is
> 2169856
> > > > > via Connected, Serial0
> > > > > P 150.100.100.0/24, 1 successors, FD is
> 2681856
> > > > > via 150.100.200.1
> (2681856/2169856),
> > > > > Serial0
> > > > > P 150.100.2.0/24, 1 successors, FD is
> 2195456
> > > > > via 150.100.200.1 (2195456/281600),
> > > Serial0
> > > > > P 150.100.3.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281600
> > > > > via Connected, Ethernet0
> > > > > P 150.100.1.0/24, 1 successors, FD is
> 2195456
> > > > > via 150.100.200.1 (2195456/281600),
> > > Serial0
> > > > > P 150.100.10.0/24, 1 successors, FD is
> 2185984
> > > > > via 150.100.200.1 (2185984/176128),
> > > Serial0
> > > > >
> > > > > Any comments?
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > Elmer
> > > > > .
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
>__________________________________________________________________
> > > > > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a
> > > message
> > > > > to
> > > > > majordomo@groupstudy.com with the body
> > > containing:
> > > > > unsubscribe ccielab
> > > >
> > >
> >__________________________________________________
> > > >Do You Yahoo!?
> > > >Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> > > >from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> > > >http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> > > >.
> > > .
> > >
>
>__________________________________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a
> message
> > > to
> > > majordomo@groupstudy.com with the body
> containing:
> > > unsubscribe ccielab
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> >from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> >http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> .
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:44 GMT-3