From: Jennifer Bellucci (Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 06 2003 - 17:03:45 GMT-3
While I was running 11.2 IOS I got in the habit of configuring the
interfaces in the order I wanted the RID. Like, config the serial and get it
up and running...like below...
When you read the lab, I guess things like RIDs and stuff like that will
standout, and it becomes more important when your running bgp on the same
router.
Things like not being allowed to configure hello timers and ospf net types,
bgp sync with no direct route advertised, tcp acl without the establish cmd,
voice vlan values and how they effect other things, what effects can a
summary route have on the look of the routing table. What is meant by
locking-down configs, and knowing that your red will not fall apart when
doing some of the more interesting things, know that when you reload ur
still in the same position. Solid practice of configuring things, fast and
simple with no log winded scrolls, knowing your mistake before you think ur
going to make it. Think of being in the matrix but instead of green letters
coming down ur screen, you only have green lights and they don't move in any
direction.Things like that, I know you heard them all before, in the
archives you will find a wealth of info that will give you insight into what
you are looking for.
Forget to mention that the wording thing, I take it you have sat 350. You
should know that you can kill the exam with little knowledge, just pay
attention to the words, in each question there was a word that gave you the
answer. I think the lab will be similar, its supposedly designed by
lawyers...when you read the task or list of thing you have to do, they might
not even make sense as they are written and so, will have to take the lines
and join them else where for them to make sense, kind of re-writing the exam
for urself.
I am going to end this email as it is becoming obvious I need to get a life.
!
int s0
clock rate 64000
ip add 131.108.66.199 255.255.255.0
encap frame
ip ospf pri 100
ip ospf hell 20
no shut
router ospf 1
net 131.108.66.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
end
conf t
int e0
ip add 20.20.20.1 255.255.240.0
ip ospf pri 0
ip ospf net point-to-point
no shut
int loop0
ip add 1.1.1.100 255.240.0.0
ip ospf net point-to-point
router ospf 1
net 20.20.20.1 0.0.0.0 area 40
net 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 90
end
----- Original Message -----
From: "Desmond" <cciestudy@sympatico.ca>
To: <Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Lab requirements and interpretation
> If the question doesn't mention, can I put router-ids and
> "soft-reconfiguration in" on all BGP routers ?
>
> Desmond
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de>
> To: <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:47 AM
> Subject: RE: Lab requirements and interpretation
>
>
> > Here is my 2 cents
> >
> > 1- Yes you are allowed to use the router-id unless he tells you not use
> it.
> > 2- Connectivity is not enough. You have to meet the requirements.
> > 3- Sure some of the interfaces may not be used, this included the router
> and
> > switch interfaces.
> >
> > IT IS ALL ABOUT MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS WORD BY WORD.
> >
> > Sam
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sundar Palaniappan [mailto:sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 9:36 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Lab requirements and interpretation
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The more you read the more questions you get. Here are a few, can people
> > shed some light on it.
> >
> > 1. Are we allowed to add router-id on all OSPF routers even though it's
> not
> > explicitly allowed/denied in the lab requirments.
> >
> > 2. Without violating the lab rules if I am able to provide complete
> network
> > connectivity, would that be enough. Or do we need to try to interpret
what
> > the lab requires us to do.
> >
> > 3. In some of the practice labs I did, some of the interfaces are not
part
> > of any routing protocol. Is this an error in the practice lab or is this
a
> > realistic scenario.
> >
> > I see people coming under fire off-late a lot for asking questions about
> the
> >
> > real lab. Hope this doesn't trigger anything like that as I don't think
> any
> > of these questions violate NDA.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sundar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*.
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> > .
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:43 GMT-3