From: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de
Date: Mon Jan 06 2003 - 11:47:42 GMT-3
Here is my 2 cents
1- Yes you are allowed to use the router-id unless he tells you not use it.
2- Connectivity is not enough. You have to meet the requirements.
3- Sure some of the interfaces may not be used, this included the router and
switch interfaces.
IT IS ALL ABOUT MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS WORD BY WORD.
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: Sundar Palaniappan [mailto:sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 9:36 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Lab requirements and interpretation
Hi,
The more you read the more questions you get. Here are a few, can people
shed some light on it.
1. Are we allowed to add router-id on all OSPF routers even though it's not
explicitly allowed/denied in the lab requirments.
2. Without violating the lab rules if I am able to provide complete network
connectivity, would that be enough. Or do we need to try to interpret what
the lab requires us to do.
3. In some of the practice labs I did, some of the interfaces are not part
of any routing protocol. Is this an error in the practice lab or is this a
realistic scenario.
I see people coming under fire off-late a lot for asking questions about the
real lab. Hope this doesn't trigger anything like that as I don't think any
of these questions violate NDA.
Thanks,
Sundar
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:43 GMT-3