From: Jay Greenberg (groupstudylist@execulink.com)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2003 - 13:51:49 GMT-3
It looks like RIP is auto-summarizing 160.100.1.0/24 at the Class B
boundary. 133.10.2.0/24 may not be summarized because of how it is
assigned to any of the interfaces on that router. 192.190.102.0 would
be summarized at the Class-C boundary anyway.
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 06:28, Sage Vadi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a seeming conundrum.
>
> R1 OSPF routes (redistributed on same router and sent
> into RIP process) -
>
> 1. O E2 160.100.1.0/24
>
> 2. O IA 133.10.2.0/24
>
> 3. O E2 192.190.102.0/24
>
> Redistributed into RIP (debug ip rip) -
>
> 1. network 160.100.0.0 metric 2 ***???
>
> 2. subnet 133.10.2.0 metric 2
>
> 3. network 192.190.102.0 metric 2
>
> Q) Why does network 160.100.1.0/24 not get inserted
> into the RIP process as 160.100.1.0 like points 2. and
> 3. respectively. RIP version 1.
>
> Cheers,
> Sage
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:40 GMT-3