From: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de
Date: Thu Jan 02 2003 - 11:30:29 GMT-3
In case of the CBWFQ, the guy is talking about the bandwidth not the IP
precedence. CBWFQ does not take IP precedence into effect unless you create
an extended access list with the IP precedence is one of the matching
criteria.
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Chang [mailto:changjoe@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:38 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: CBWFQ and IP precedence question
Hi all,
Is it true that in CBWFQ, the IP precedence of a packet does not have a
direct effect on the weighting of conversation queues? That's how Im
understanding the doc on CBWFQ:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/qos_
c
//qcprt2/xtocid16
As I understand it IP precedence is relevant only in the flow
differentiation step. Queues are weighed explicitly through the bandwidth
command.
But then at the near the end of the section the author goes on to say:
"CBWFQ uses the weights assigned to the queued packets to ensure that the
class queue is serviced fairly."
Is the guy talking about IP precedence weight or bandwidth-assigned weight?
Thanks,
Joe
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:39 GMT-3