From: Aidan Marks (amarks@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Dec 31 2002 - 00:06:33 GMT-3
[no] dlsw disable
At 01:54 PM 31/12/2002, Hunt Lee wrote:
>Aidan,
>
>What commands do you use to kill a peer connection???
>
>The only one I know is "clear dlsw circuit <circuit number>"... is that what
>you were referring to??
>
>Hunt
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Aidan Marks [mailto:amarks@cisco.com]
>Sent: Monday, 30 December 2002 9:48 PM
>To: Hunt Lee
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: DLSW+ Lite Question - more
>
>
>Did you kill the peer connection? shut/no shut etc - changing the mtu on
>the fly won't help. The error msg below means the mtu is still 1500 at the
>time the peer was exchanging capabilities.
>
>I just tested this and the error msg disappears when you set the mtu
>higher, 1600 for example and I understand this to fix the problem from
>internal information even though I do not have netbios hosts handy.
>
>Aidan
>
>At 10:25 PM 30/12/2002, Hunt Lee wrote:
>
> >Aidan,
> >
> >Also, I did saw a suspiscous error message... I have searched everywhere
> >on CCO, but
> >I couldn't find anything.
> >
> >%DLSWP-3-PLFCHANGE: WAN media mtu maximum is 516; lowering peer lf
> >
> >Hunt
> >
> >
> > --- Aidan Marks <amarks@cisco.com> wrote: > any change if you increase
> > the WAN mtu
> >(FR) on both sides to say 1600?
> > >
> > > We cannot fragment frames with direct encap and with ethernet there is
>no
> > > way to tell end stations to send only up to a maximum size. As a
> > > consequence for ethernet attached end devices IOS checks to have a WAN
>mtu
> > > bigger than the max frame size allowed on ethernet.
> > >
> > > Aidan
> > >
> > > At 11:39 AM 29/12/2002, Hunt Lee wrote:
> > >
> > > >I'm sure this question has been asked a million times, but the archives
> > > >aren't giving me the answer I'm looking for. How do you configure
> > DLSw Lite?
> > > >
> > > >PC A -- RTA --- Frame-Relay Switch --- RTB -- PC B
> > > >
> > > >When I initiate traffic by clicking on Network Neighborhood, I can see
> > the MAC
> > > >addresses showing up from the "show bridge" command & "show dlsw
> > > >reachability" & I
> > > >can also see the DLSW peers' states as "Connect". Yet the circuit
>keeps
> > > >on getting
> > > >to the "CKT_START" state (as shown below), then the circuit will
> > > >disappear, and I
> > > >just can't see the other computer via Network Neighborhood.
> > > >
> > > >RTB#sh dlsw circuits
> > > >Index local addr(lsap) remote
> > addr(dsap) state uptime
> > > >788529156 000a.5d6e.57fa(F0) 000a.209d.a221(F0)
> > CKT_START -
> > > >RTB#
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >And here are some other show outputs...
> > > >
> > > >RTA#sh bridge
> > > >
> > > >Total of 300 station blocks, 298 free
> > > >Codes: P - permanent, S - self
> > > >
> > > >Bridge Group 1:
> > > >
> > > > Address Action Interface Age RX count TX count
> > > >0050.ba76.ea5f forward DLSw Port0 1 4 0
> > > >0050.04b9.4584 forward FastEthernet0/0 0 7 0
> > > >RTA#
> > > >
> > > >RTB#sh bridge
> > > >
> > > >Total of 300 station blocks, 298 free
> > > >Codes: P - permanent, S - self
> > > >
> > > >Bridge Group 1:
> > > >
> > > > Address Action Interface Age RX count TX count
> > > >0050.ba76.ea5f forward Ethernet0 1 4 0
> > > >0050.04b9.4584 forward DLSw Port0 0 4 0
> > > >RTB#
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >RTA#sh dlsw peer
> > > >Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts
> > > >TCP uptime
> > > > LLC2 Se0/0.1 120 CONNECT 174 160 conf 0 0
>-
> > > > 00:46:53
> > > >Total number of connected peers: 1
> > > >Total number of connections: 1
> > > >
> > > >RTB#sh dlsw peer
> > > >Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts
> > > >TCP uptime
> > > > LLC2 Se0 121 CONNECT 159 170 conf 0 0
>-
> > > > 00:46:14
> > > >Total number of connected peers: 1
> > > >Total number of connections: 1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Here are the config for my routers...
> > > >
> > > >For RTA-
> > > >
> > > >dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 promiscuous
> > > >dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0.1 120
> > > >dlsw bridge-group 1
> > > >
> > > >interface Loopback0
> > > > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> > > >
> > > >interface FastEthernet0/0
> > > > no ip address
> > > > speed 10
> > > > half-duplex
> > > > bridge-group 1
> > > >
> > > >interface Serial0/0
> > > > no ip address
> > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > no fair-queue
> > > > frame-relay lmi-type cisco
> > > >!
> > > >interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
> > > > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > > > no ip split-horizon eigrp 2001
> > > > frame-relay map llc2 120 broadcast
> > > > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.5 110 broadcast
> > > > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.6 120 broadcast
> > > >
> > > >router eigrp 2001
> > > > passive-interface FastEthernet0/0
> > > > network 1.0.0.0
> > > > network 172.16.0.0
> > > > no auto-summary
> > > >
> > > >bridge 1 protocol ieee
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >As for RTB:-
> > > >
> > > >dlsw local-peer peer-id 3.3.3.3
> > > >dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0 121
> > > >dlsw bridge-group 1
> > > >
> > > >interface Loopback1
> > > > ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255
> > > >
> > > >interface Ethernet0
> > > > no ip address
> > > > bridge-group 1
> > > >
> > > >interface Serial0
> > > > ip address 172.16.1.6 255.255.255.0
> > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > no fair-queue
> > > > clockrate 64000
> > > > frame-relay map llc2 121 broadcast
> > > > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.5 121 broadcast
> > > > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 121 broadcast
> > > > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > > >
> > > >router eigrp 2001
> > > > network 3.0.0.0
> > > > network 172.16.0.0
> > > > no auto-summary
> > > > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
> > > >
> > > >bridge 1 protocol ieee
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Did I do anything wrong???
> > > >
> > > >Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
> > > >.
> > > >
> > > >http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
> > > >- What's on at your local cinema?
> > > >.
> >http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
> >- What's on at your local cinema?
>.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:55 GMT-3