RE: NBAR PORT 80 P2P

From: Cary Anderson (cary@cisco.com)
Date: Fri Dec 27 2002 - 10:16:00 GMT-3

Next message: Daniel Prinsloo: "OT - Freelance Engineers in the UK"
Previous message: Stefan L. Dozier: "RE: Adjusting Admin Distance to Influence Route Selection"
Maybe in reply to: John Messina: "NBAR PORT 80 P2P"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Here is another one:

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft
/122t/122t8/dtnbarad.htm#1079748

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Dang Quang Minh
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 10:45 PM
To: 'John Messina'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: NBAR PORT 80 P2P

Check out this link

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121newft
/121limit/121e/121e2/nbar2e.htm#xtocid2979332

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
John Messina
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 8:42 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: NBAR PORT 80 P2P

Will NBAR with the latest pdlm be capable of recognizing traffic on port
80 that is p2p like kazAa and differentiate between that and HTTP?. In
other words can I rate limit and/or Drop P2P applications functioning on
port 80 and not effect HTTP? Most documentation suggests "deep packet
inspection" and recognizing statefulness but I was curious if anyone
knows if this is reliable. If this is possible any examples of a
configuration that may work?

Thank you for any feedback.
.
.

Next message: Daniel Prinsloo: "OT - Freelance Engineers in the UK"
Previous message: Stefan L. Dozier: "RE: Adjusting Admin Distance to Influence Route Selection"
Maybe in reply to: John Messina: "NBAR PORT 80 P2P"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:53 GMT-3