From: Tim Fletcher (tim@fletchmail.net)
Date: Fri Dec 20 2002 - 01:12:09 GMT-3
Dialer watch doesn't work that way. Once it comes up it will stay up until there is another route. Interesting traffic is irrelevant. Usually I do not even define a dialer-group.
It does however use the idle-timeout interval to determine how often to check the routes.
-Tim Fletcher
At 06:31 PM 12/19/02 -0500, Todd Veillette wrote:
>Along the same lines, dialer watch works great -
>EXCEPT I have yet to come up with a dialer watch
>solution that comes up when you lose your route(s)
>AND will go back down based on not having any
>interesting traffic over the route(s).
>
>Any Ideas?
>-TV
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tim Fletcher" <tim@fletchmail.net>
>To: "rehan u nedaria" <rehannedaria@rediffmail.com>;
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:47 AM
>Subject: Re: Dialer Watch
>
>
>> Rehen,
>>
>> That the way I've always done it. If you define interesting traffic, the
>> link can come up even if your route is still valid. So if you only want it
>> to come up when your route disappears, don't define interesting traffic.
>>
>> -Tim Fletcher
>>
>> At 12:31 PM 12/19/2002 +0000, rehan u nedaria wrote:
>> >Hi Guys
>> > A query on dialer watch-list.I was going through a scenario
>> > where they had asked me that if a specific network goes down say
>10.0.0.0
>> > then the isdn should trigger.
>> >
>> >I used dialer watch list where i did not used the diler-group command for
>> >intresting traffic.This works fine.
>> >
>> >Is this configuration without creating the intresting traffic is right.
>> >
>> >Regards
>> >Rehan
>> >.
>> .
>.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:49 GMT-3