Re: ATM Question - Back to Back OC3 (Working Config)

From: kym blair (kymblair@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 17 2002 - 15:35:53 GMT-3

Next message: Adam Crisp: "RE: Re: Gigastack - What is the point?"
Previous message: Chuck Church: "Re: Gigastack - What is the point?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

R1
interface ATM0
ip address 150.50.6.6 255.255.255.128
atm clock INTERNAL
no atm ilmi-keepalive
pvc 1/32
  protocol ip 150.50.6.6 broadcast
  protocol ip 150.50.6.9 broadcast
  encapsulation aal5snap

R2
interface ATM0
ip address 150.50.6.9 255.255.255.128
atm clock INTERNAL
no atm ilmi-keepalive
pvc 1/32
  protocol ip 150.50.6.6 broadcast
  protocol ip 150.50.6.9 broadcast
  encapsulation aal5snap

You can also do subinterfaces (it is customary to use Multipoint
subinterfaces with ATM so you can map a subinterface to a pvc). Without a
switch, I don't think you can do PVC-discovery or SVCs.

HTH, Kym

>From: "Walker, James - Is" <JWALKER2@PARTNERS.ORG>
>Reply-To: "Walker, James - Is" <JWALKER2@PARTNERS.ORG>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: ATM Question - Back to Back OC3
>Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:36:01 -0500
>
>Is it possible to connect 2 ATM routers back to back without the use of
>LS1010?
>
>I'm pulling my hair that I don't have much of.
>
>Thanks
>.

Next message: Adam Crisp: "RE: Re: Gigastack - What is the point?"
Previous message: Chuck Church: "Re: Gigastack - What is the point?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:47 GMT-3