From: Sam Lai (slai@gggroup.net)
Date: Tue Dec 17 2002 - 13:49:07 GMT-3
I think you can place these "area 0" into two separate routing proccess on R3. And you can redistribute between these two instances. This way, the routes at "area 1" on R1-R2 looks like type7 routes to R4 and vise versa. What do you think?
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Joe Chang
Sent: Tue 12/17/2002 9:37 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: a question about ospf area
It may work alright, but there will be routing irregularites. For example
the routes advertised by one half of the split area will not be advertised
into the other half by area 0 because of OSPF's routing loop prevention
rule.
----- Original Message -----
From: "csc david" <davidcsc2002@yahoo.com.cn>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:54 PM
Subject: a question about ospf area
> Hello, all:
>
> if an ospf area is split by area 0, can that area still work alright?
>
> R1(area 1)R2(area 0)R3(area 0)R4(area 1)
>
> that is to say: does R1 see the routes about R4?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> "OVTZ?*J<,HCWJQ6L}Dc5D!"
> .
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:47 GMT-3