From: Michael Todd (michaeldtodd@comcast.net)
Date: Mon Dec 16 2002 - 21:22:05 GMT-3
The reason that your test didn't work is because you are telling the router
to help UDP packets, and then you pinged. Pings aren't UDP. I can't think of
a better way of testing it unless you want to forge your own UDP packets and
sniff traffic between and on each side of the routers to see where it is
multicast and where it is broadcast.
Mike
CCIE # 10858
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: unicast-2-multicast
> Can you tell us something about the multicast network you set up for this
> test? For example if you implemented dense-mode did you see the mroute for
> your converted multicast address on the remote router?
>
> > many thanks for your reply. but i was wondering i could could map even
all
> > unicasts to a host on a particular protocol and port number to convert
it
> > into a multicast to feed the multicast domain.. i've tried using
> helper-map,
> > configs look okay but couldnt figure out a method to do testing with it.
> did
> > permit udp any any broadcast-2-multicast-2broadcast. did forward
protocol
> > udp
> > and enabled directed-broadcast..did a ping on the local segment
x.x.x.255
> > and 255.255.255.255 ..got reply from the local broadcast domain but the
> > remote never replied..
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:47 GMT-3