From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Fri Dec 13 2002 - 08:08:11 GMT-3
Replied to wrong list.. Sorry about that.
Subject: Re: virtual link and nssa
From: Peter van Oene <pvo@usermail.com>
To: cisco@groupstudy.com
In-Reply-To: <F97DPT1pqdlTVnk2zUa000059a8@hotmail.com>
References: <F97DPT1pqdlTVnk2zUa000059a8@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8
Date: 13 Dec 2002 05:02:08 -0500
Message-Id: <1039773729.20597.458.camel@almo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 05:59, Sara Li wrote:
> Dear all, I am doing the cyscoexpert sample lab.
> R1--area12--R2---Area51---R5---Area0 area 12 cant receive lsa type 5
> routes, so it need to be either a nssa or stub, however, there is virtual
> link between r2 and r5, can r2 be configured with stub or nssa at the
> same time with virtual link to r5? i thought i read it somewhere stub
> cant be virtual link? Pls help.
Virtual Links must not use stub areas for transit due to the fact that
the virtual link does not provide for type 5 flooding, and therefore
expects the transit area to provide these LSAs. An NSSA area is a stub
area.
Pete
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:45 GMT-3