From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Fri Dec 13 2002 - 08:07:36 GMT-3
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 08:56, Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de wrote:
> Hello Sara,
>
> Once a virtual link configured in Area51 between R2 and R5, area 12 will
> become part of the backbone area 0 (all backbone routes will appear as o in
> the routing table, not IA) As a result of that area 12 can not be a stub or
> nssa area. Please refer to Doyle 1. It has an example and good explanation.
Area 12 can certainly be stub, it's area 51 that can't.
>
> Sam
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sara Li [mailto:saralilin@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:59 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: virtual link and nssa
>
>
> Dear all, I am doing the cyscoexpert sample lab.
> R1--area12--R2---Area51---R5---Area0 area 12 cant receive lsa type 5 routes,
> so it need to be either a nssa or stub, however, there is virtual link
> between r2 and r5, can r2 be configured with stub or nssa at the same time
> with virtual link to r5? i thought i read it somewhere stub cant be virtual
> link? Pls help.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:45 GMT-3