From: Vijay S Jayaraman (vjayaram@in.ibm.com)
Date: Fri Dec 13 2002 - 11:49:10 GMT-3
Sam....
Are you sure thats the way it is?.....I thought only the transit area for
the virtual link, in this case area 51 couldnt have the stub flag set in
case....
Regards,
Vijay.
Sam.MicroGate@usa
.telekom.de To: saralilin@hotmail.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent by: cc:
nobody@groupstudy Subject: RE: virtual link and nssa
.com
12/13/2002 07:26
PM
Please respond to
Sam.MicroGate
Hello Sara,
Once a virtual link configured in Area51 between R2 and R5, area 12 will
become part of the backbone area 0 (all backbone routes will appear as o in
the routing table, not IA) As a result of that area 12 can not be a stub or
nssa area. Please refer to Doyle 1. It has an example and good explanation.
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: Sara Li [mailto:saralilin@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:59 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: virtual link and nssa
Dear all, I am doing the cyscoexpert sample lab.
R1--area12--R2---Area51---R5---Area0 area 12 cant receive lsa type 5
routes,
so it need to be either a nssa or stub, however, there is virtual link
between r2 and r5, can r2 be configured with stub or nssa at the same time
with virtual link to r5? i thought i read it somewhere stub cant be virtual
link? Pls help.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:45 GMT-3