From: Jay Greenberg (groupstudylist@execulink.com)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 13:47:19 GMT-3
I don't understand the following. This document specifies that to
ensure that only routes of minimum cost will be used, use:
Router(config-router)# traffic-share min
Router(config-router)# variance 1
But what doesn't make sense to me is, if variance is 1, then how could
two routes of different cost ever end up in the routing table anyway?
Wouldn't variance 1 render traffic-share min useless?
Jay
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:44 GMT-3