From: Wes Morris (wmorris@ceriumnetworks.com)
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 14:33:39 GMT-3
You will notice on your R1 that the two statics appear as type S in the routing table. These are not type O and so are not redistributed into eigrp by R1. Try putting some statics on another Rx running ospf and redistribute static into OSPF at that other point; then R1 will see them as O E2 (or 1 if your prefer) and redistribute them into eigrp (assuming you are not restrictive by route type when using the "redistribute ospf x" command under eigrp.)
Yes your link state database on R1 shows the type-5 links but the redistribution is driven by the route table. Consider a router running rip, eigrp, and ospf. It is receiving a type internal route to network x.x.x.x via both eigrp and ospf. If we redistribute ospf into rip, downstream rip listeners will not see x.x.x.x because in the route table we see x.x.x.x as "D" not "O" even though you will see x.x.x.x in the ospf database.
-wes
>> dear all
>> i have one doubt with eigrp and ospf redistribution.
>> R1 running ospf and eigrp
>> R2 running only eigrp
>> R1 has two static routes --> redistributed in to ospf --> all other ospf
>> routers see this two redistributed routes
>> sh ip ospf data external -- > shows this two static routes
>> IN R1 ospf redistributed in to EIGRP .
>> R2 sees all other ospf routes except those two static routes.. WHAT could
>> be the problem
>> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:43 GMT-3