RE: Question regarding signature for groupstudy.

From: Tony Schaffran (tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 12:06:17 GMT-3


Is a signature really the only thing that you have to complain about?

I am learning a lot from this study group, and I try to answer what I
know. I have developed quite a few relationships, both personal and
professional, from this group.

If my little two lines of free publicity really bother people in this
study group, please let me know. I would hardly call it a waste of
bandwidth. Just because a few people have seen my signature over and
over, there are quite a few more that have not. It lets people know
some of my experiences and maybe a way I can help them in theirs.

Best regards.

 
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
 
CCOnlineLabs.com
http://www.cconlinelabs.com

 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ouellette, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:45 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Question regarding signature for groupstudy.

Hey all. This group is a great resource but I'm wondering if we can
come up
with a guideline for signature files. Lately i've noticed a lot of
advertisement type taglines for people's dotcom's for training purposes.
I
think it's a waste of bandwidth to see the same signature at the end of
each
email and we already know the person sending the email. Isn't the main
purpose for a signature file so that people know how to contact you,
don't
we already know this through groupstudy?

Tim
.
.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:43 GMT-3