From: Jay Greenberg (groupstudylist@execulink.com)
Date: Tue Dec 10 2002 - 09:20:03 GMT-3
Event with passive-ineterface?
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 23:54, Tran Tien Phong wrote:
> For RIP, although you configure neighbor command, RIP updates still sent to multicast address 224.0.0.9. You need to define an access-list to prevent this
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ram Shummoogum [mailto:rshummoo@ca.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tue 12/10/2002 8:21 AM
> To: eward15@juno.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re:eigrp neighbor command
>
>
>
> This is true for RIP but I am not sure about EIGRP. I know for a fact that
> in EIGRP the passive-interface will prevent the formation of neighbors.
>
> Rgds,
> RAM
>
>
>
> eward15@juno.com@groupstudy.com on 12/09/2002 07:52:52 PM
>
> Please respond to eward15@juno.com
>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
>
>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> cc:
> Subject: Re:eigrp neighbor command
>
>
> I believe the neighbor command is used to send routing annoucements as
> unicast packets instead of multicast or broadcast cast packets. For
> instance, there may be 5 routers on a segment but only two of them are
> using the same routing protocol. Instead of needlessly sending updates to
> the other routers, you could use a passive-interface to block the
> broadcasts/multicasts on the interface and instead send a directed unicast.
> Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Eugene Ward
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
> Only $9.95 per month!
> Visit www.juno.com
> .
> .
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:42 GMT-3