From: goody goody (ccie_studying@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 12:36:02 GMT-3
additional to add static route 150.50.8.0/24 pointing to null0 interface and
redistribute into RIP, please also add following:
RIP:
router rip
no auto
redistribute ospf metric x subnet
router ospf 1
no auto
redistribute rip metric y subnet
Have a nice day!
>From: "Janto Cin" <jantocin@datacomm.co.id>
>Reply-To: "Janto Cin" <jantocin@datacomm.co.id>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>CC: <dhoode@skylinecomputer.com>
>Subject: Mutual Redistribution between RIP and OSPF Again
>Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:20:29 +0700
>
>Dear All,
>
>I've problem when doing mutual redistribution between RIP and OSPF.
>
>R5(e0)------(e0)R7(s0)-------(s0)R8(e0)
>
>R5 e0: 150.50.201.5/24
>R7 e0: 150.50.201.7/24
>R7 s0: 192.168.10.1/30
>R8 s0: 192.168.10.2/30
>R8 lo0: 150.50.8.8/32
>R8 e0: 10.1.1.1/8
>
>R5-R7 as OSPF area 0, R7-R8 as RIPv1 and mutual redistribution between
>both protocols at R7.
>
>I can see R8 lo0 in R5 routing table but why I can't see 150.50.201.0/24
>in R8 routing table?
>If I remove the lo0 at R8, I have route 150.50.0.0/16 in R8 routing
>table.
>How to achieve connectivity by not remove the lo0 at R8 and not use the
>static/default route?
>TIA.
>
>Kind Regards,
>Janto
>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:41 GMT-3