From: CCOnlineLabs.com (tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 10:58:16 GMT-3
You are probably just seeing 150.50.0.0/16 in R8's routing table, am I
correct? Think about RIPv1. If you need further explanation, let me
know.
Tony Schaffran
CCOnlineLabs.com
http://www.cconlinelabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Janto Cin
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 10:20 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: dhoode@skylinecomputer.com
Subject: Mutual Redistribution between RIP and OSPF Again
Dear All,
I've problem when doing mutual redistribution between RIP and OSPF.
R5(e0)------(e0)R7(s0)-------(s0)R8(e0)
R5 e0: 150.50.201.5/24
R7 e0: 150.50.201.7/24
R7 s0: 192.168.10.1/30
R8 s0: 192.168.10.2/30
R8 lo0: 150.50.8.8/32
R8 e0: 10.1.1.1/8
R5-R7 as OSPF area 0, R7-R8 as RIPv1 and mutual redistribution between
both protocols at R7.
I can see R8 lo0 in R5 routing table but why I can't see 150.50.201.0/24
in R8 routing table?
If I remove the lo0 at R8, I have route 150.50.0.0/16 in R8 routing
table.
How to achieve connectivity by not remove the lo0 at R8 and not use the
static/default route?
TIA.
Kind Regards,
Janto
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:41 GMT-3